Thích Nhất Hạnh on “interbeing”
incidentally, “interest” is, literally construed, the same word: Latin inter- + esse (“to be”)
Thích Nhất Hạnh was born on this day, 1926. Below is a selection from an ethics compendium that I compiled for the ethics classes that I teach.
Thích Nhất Hạnh (1926-2022), or “Thay,” was a Vietnamese Zen Buddhist monk and peace activist and is classed among the most beloved and influential teachers of Buddhism in modern history. He is also the author of countless books expounding the principles of Buddhist meditation and mindfulness practice in a simple and accessible manner. In the excerpt below, taken from his 1991 book Peace in Every Step, despite refraining from discussion of any explicitly Buddhist practices, Nhat Hanh sets forth the fundamental paradigm or metaphysic of pratītyasamutpāda, or “dependent origination,” that grounds such practices without resorting to technical or esoteric language.
From Peace in Every Step:
If you are a poet, you will see clearly that there is a cloud floating in this sheet of paper. Without a cloud, there will be no rain; without rain, the trees cannot grow: and without trees, we cannot make paper. The cloud is essential for the paper to exist. If the cloud is not here, the sheet of paper cannot be here either. So we can say that the cloud and the paper inter-are.
“Interbeing”1 is a word that is not in the dictionary yet, but if we combine the prefix inter- with the verb “to be,” we have a new verb, inter-be. Without a cloud, we cannot have paper, so we can say that the cloud and the sheet of paper inter-are.
If we look into this sheet of paper even more deeply, we can see the sunshine in it. If the sunshine is not there, the forest cannot grow. In fact nothing can grow. Even we cannot grow without sunshine. And so, we know that the sunshine is also in this sheet of paper. The paper and the sunshine inter-are. And if we continue to look we can see the logger who cut the tree and brought it to the mill to be transformed into paper. And we see the wheat. We know that the logger cannot exist without his daily bread, and therefore the wheat that became his bread is also in this sheet of paper. And the logger’s father and mother are in it too.
When we look in this way we see that without all of these things, this sheet of paper cannot exist.
Looking even more deeply, we can see ourselves in this sheet of paper too. This is not difficult to see, because when we look at a sheet of paper, it is part of our perception. Your mind is in here and mine is also. So we can say that everything is in here with this sheet of paper. We cannot point out one thing that is not here—time, space, the earth, the rain, the minerals in the soil, the sunshine, the cloud, the river, the heat.
Everything co-exists with this sheet of paper. That is why I think the word inter-be should be in the dictionary. “To be” is to inter-be. We cannot just be by ourselves alone. We have to inter-he with every other thing. This sheet of paper is, because everything else is. Suppose we try to return one of the elements to its source.
Suppose we return the sunshine to the sun. Do you think that this sheet of paper will be possible? No, without sunshine nothing can be. And if we return the logger to his mother, then we have no sheet of paper either. The fact is that this sheet of paper is made up only of “non-paper” elements. And if we return these non-paper elements to their sources, then there can be no paper at all. Without non-paper elements, like mind, logger, and sunshine and so on, there will be no paper. As thin as this sheet of paper is, it contains everything in the universe in it.
incidentally, “interest” is in the dictionary and, literally construed, it is the same word: Latin inter- (“among,” “amidst,” “between”+ esse (“to be,” “being”)
Thank you for the recommendation to False Mirror.