I think moral relative activists know that their position is logically indefensible and only make emotive claims of x-ism is wrong as a practical matter as it appeals to the 'universal' moralist's values. I really think it is a game with such folks and that is why they have such logically conflicting moral values.
Furthermore, how does a multicultural society work? Why are not my personal values as said as my culture's?
Relativism leads to ethical emotivism : Racism "Yuck!" and 'might makes right' where 'right' elicits "Yay!"
It took centuries to civilize men and tame the 'Patriarchy' and in a short time I see the blowback being the acceptance of relativism and might makes right by masculinity releasing havoc on all feminine virtues. the only power those without power have is t appeal to the hight virtue of this who do and that of following the rules. if those without blatantly break the rules, how long before those with do as well?
I think moral relative activists know that their position is logically indefensible and only make emotive claims of x-ism is wrong as a practical matter as it appeals to the 'universal' moralist's values. I really think it is a game with such folks and that is why they have such logically conflicting moral values.
Furthermore, how does a multicultural society work? Why are not my personal values as said as my culture's?
Relativism leads to ethical emotivism : Racism "Yuck!" and 'might makes right' where 'right' elicits "Yay!"
It took centuries to civilize men and tame the 'Patriarchy' and in a short time I see the blowback being the acceptance of relativism and might makes right by masculinity releasing havoc on all feminine virtues. the only power those without power have is t appeal to the hight virtue of this who do and that of following the rules. if those without blatantly break the rules, how long before those with do as well?